Muller v. Muller
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered upon the sustaining of a general demurrer by defendants to his complaint, without leave to amend. Plaintiff stated in writing to the trial court that if the demurrer should be sustained it should be sustained without leave to amend. He makes the same statement to us, saying that he would not amend his complaint any further even if given leave to do so. This eliminates any question as to an abuse of discretion by the trial court in not affording to appellant an opportunity to amend his complaint. (See Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Routh v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Muller v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Brown v. AguilarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- People v. GrossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Marshall v. SUPERIOR COURT, MARICOPA CTY.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982