Legal Opinion
In Re Martinez
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 31, 1942No. Crim. 1808PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Petitioner was convicted in the Police Court of the City of Sacramento of violating a municipal ordinance fixing the rate of charges for taxicab service rendered within the city limits. On habeas corpus he asserts that he is now illegally restrained of his liberty because said ordinance is unconstitutional insofar as it attempts to fix such rates. It is not contended that it is unreasonable or discriminatory.
Prior to the filing of the petition herein an appeal was taken to the superior court where the judgment of the police court was affirmed. Because of this, respondent now…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- In Re CardinalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Morel v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Yellow Taxicab Co. v. GaynorNew York Supreme Court · 1913
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Larson v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Desert Turf Club v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Pitney-Bowes, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- In Re BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.