Legal Opinion
Morel v. Railroad Commission
California Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1938No. L. A. 16232PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
By this proceeding the petitioner seeks to annul an order of the respondent, the Railroad Commission of the State of California, requiring the petitioner, Victor Morel, to cease and desist from conducting any and all operations for the transportation of property for compensation or hire, as a business, over the public highways in the city of Los Angeles by means of any motor vehicle, unless and until he shall first have secured from the Railroad Commission a proper permit authorizing him to operate the same.
The order which petitioner seeks to have annulled was made, and the proceedings…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Stephenson v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Hadfield v. LundinWashington Supreme Court · 1917
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- People v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Hartwell Corporation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Southern California Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.