Legal Opinion

Desert Turf Club v. Board of Supervisors

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 1956No. Civ. 5262PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONLEY, J. pro tem. *

This case involves the proper definition and delimitation of authority as between the state and the county of Riverside in their respective control and administration of horse racing and zoning.

The appellant, Desert Turf Club, a corporation, after securing a permit from the California Horse Racing Board to conduct quarter-horse racing at the site hereafter described, made written application to the Riverside County Planning Commission for a land use permit to establish, operate and maintain a race track on Zone M-3 land in the Northwest Quarter and the North Half of the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Walker v. City of San GabrielCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Douglass v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Mann v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Big Creek Lumber Co. v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Floresta, Inc. v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Flagstad v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Longwell v. HodgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Case v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API