Legal Opinion

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Fales

California Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1973No. S.F. 22914PublishedCited by 84 opinions

L. F. Haeberle III and Donald S. Britt for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

Section 11580.2, subdivision (g), of the Insurance Code1 provides that an insurer paying a claim under an uninsured motorist endorsement in an automobile insurance policy shall be entitled to be subrogated to the rights of the insured to whom such claim was paid against the person causing the injury, to the extent that payment was made. It provides further that an action against the uninsured motorist may be brought by the insurer within three years from the date the claim was paid.

Jun Maeyama was insured by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter Liberty) under a policy…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. In Re William M.California Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. Department of EmploymentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. American Civil Liberties Union v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Bradbury v. HigginsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. EubanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Lundquist v. ReusserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Giraldo v. Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API