Legal Opinion

Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. Department of Employment

California Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1961No. Sac. 7279; Sac. 7283PublishedCited by 70 opinions

Simonelli and Fransen and Nels B. Fransen for Intervener and Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Petitioners, Di Giorgio Fruit Corporation and Thomas C. Bowers, brought separate actions for writs of mandate to compel respondents, the Department of Employment of the State of California and its director and employees, to refer agricultural workers to petitioners’ fruit ranches during the harvest season in 1960. A strike called by the Agricultural Workers Organizing Committee, AFL-CIO, was in progress at each ranch. Pursuant to a regulation of the United States Secretary of Labor1 issued under the Wagner-Peyser Act (48 Stat. 113 (1933) as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 49-49n (1956)) the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Carlson v. LandonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re William M.California Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the BlindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API