Legal Opinion

Lundquist v. Reusser

California Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1994No. S030738PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, J.

Under the “common-interest privilege,” codified in California in Civil Code section 47, subdivision (c) (hereafter section 47(c)), 1 a defendant who makes a statement to others on a matter of common interest is immunized from liability for defamation so long as the statement is made “without malice.” In this case we must determine whether, when it is established that the statement in question was made on an occasion that falls within the parameters of the common-interest privilege, it is the plaintiff who bears the burden of proving that the statement was made with malice, or…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Taus v. LoftusCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Coastal Abstract Service, Inc. v. First American Title Insurance Company, John M. HollenbeckCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  3. California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n. v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Hassan v. Mercy American River HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Kashian v. HarrimanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API