People v. Eubanks
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
When the victim of an alleged crime contributes financially to the costs of the district attorney’s investigation, does the district *584attorney thereafter suffer from a disabling conflict of interest requiring recusal under Penal Code section 1424? On this question of first impression, we hold such financial assistance to the prosecutor’s office may indeed disqualify the district attorney from acting further in a case, if the assistance is of such character and magnitude “as to render it unlikely that defendant will receive fair treatment during all portions of the criminal…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. BreauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- People v. MauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. BirksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. SnowCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2018
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.