Legal Opinion
Adams v. Wolff
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 19, 1948No. Civ. 13556PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
The plaintiffs, all civil service employees of the defendant city and county and employed by it as automotive machinists and mechanics, by this proceeding in mandate, for an injunction and for declaratory relief, sought and secured an adjudication that under section 151.3 of . the city and county charter they are entitled to receive rates of pay for their services identical with that received in this area in private employment by machinists and mechanics pursuant to collective bargaining agreements by such private employees with their private employers.
The controversy turns upon the…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Wholesale Tobacco Dealers Bureau of Southern California, Inc. v. National Candy & Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Sonoma County Organization of Public Employees v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Kugler v. YocumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Johnson v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- County of San Diego v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.