Legal Opinion
City of Pasadena v. Charleville
California Supreme Court
Decided April 18, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 13311PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This is a petition for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent as city manager of the City of Pasadena to sign a contract authorized by the board of directors of said city for the construction of a galvanized wire fence around the Allen reservoir, a property owned and used by said city as a part of its municipally owned and operated water supply and distributive system.
The city manager refused to sign the contract which was duly awarded to and signed by the contractor, Crown Fence and Supply Company, Ltd., on the ground that said contract did not contain the specification of a general…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Adkins v. Children's Hospital of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Atkin v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Heim v. McCallSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Purdy & Fitzpatrick v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Sonoma County Organization of Public Employees v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.