Beverly Hills Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHufstedler, J.
Petitioners seek a peremptory writ of mandamus from this court ordering the respondent superior court to set aside its order denying discovery and to issue an order compelling the real parties in interest to answer questions which petitioners have propounded by way of interrogatories and oral deposition.
Petitioners seek this discovery in connection with their action in the respondent superior court in which they seek judicial review, pursuant to section 5258 of the Financial Code, of a decision by the savings and loan commissioner (“commissioner”) granting the application of Equitable Savings…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Merrill v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- American National Insurance v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Northern Inyo Hospital v. Fair Employment Practice CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.