Legal Opinion

American National Insurance v. Fair Employment & Housing Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1982No. L.A. 31408PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEWMAN, J.

Succinctly, the proceedings below and facts concerning us here were summarized by the Presiding Justice of Divison Four in the Second District of the California Courts of Appeal as follows:

*606“This is an appeal by an employer from a judgment of the superior court upholding a decision of the State Fair Employment Practice Commission on review by administrative mandamus. The issue before the commission was whether the employer violated Labor Code section 1420 in refusing employment to a man because of his elevated blood pressure which did not impair his ability to work but which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Northern Inyo Hospital v. Fair Employment Practice CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Pennsylvania v. M'Kee, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1791
  5. Beverly Hills Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Janken v. GM Hughes ElectronicsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Colmenares v. Braemar Country Club, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State Personnel Board v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Arteaga v. Brink's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API