Legal Opinion
Merrill v. Department of Motor Vehicles
California Supreme Court
Decided September 3, 1969No. L. A. No. 29627PublishedCited by 198 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
The Department of Motor Vehicl (Department) appeals from a judgment granting a writ mandate commanding it to set aside a decision denying í application for a motor vehicle dealer’s license.
Clifford L. Merrill and Harold E. Morris, dba The Me chandiser, a copartnership (Merchandiser), operate what commonly known as a membership discount house. In additk to selling furniture, appliances and household goods, Me chandiser offers new automobiles to its members by means an arrangement with several franchised automobile deale whereby the dealers sell automobiles to customers referred 1 Merchandiser…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Moran v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Yakov v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by198 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Bowland v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Palos Verdes Faculty Ass'n v. Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
193 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.