Legal Opinion

Shay v. Shay

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 2007No. 2005-2277PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

{¶ 1} In this matter, we address whether the General Assembly’s response to our decision in Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246, 725 N.E.2d 261, which was contained in Sub.S.B. No. 267, 148 Ohio Laws, Part V, 11380, 11384-11385, effective Sept. 21, 2000 (“S.B. 267”), requires an insurer to amend the coverage in a policy at a six-month renewal point within a two-year statutorily guaranteed period, if that two-year period commenced before S.B. 267 took effect.1 We hold that although an insurer and its insured may agree to amend the terms of a policy at the time of the six-month renewal,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Savoie v. Grange Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Ross v. Farmers Insurance Group of CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. SimpkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Anderson v. Barclay's Capital Real Estate, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. In re Bruce S.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. BuelowOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API