Legal Opinion

Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 27, 1986No. 85-21PublishedCited by 335 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

Petitioners have alleged that rates filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission by respondent motor carriers during the years 1966 through 1981 were fixed pursuant to an agreement forbidden by the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209, as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 1 et seq. The question presented is whether the carriers are subject to treble-damages liability in a private antitrust action if the allegation is true.

*411The question requires us to give careful consideration to the way in which Congress has accommodated the sometimes conflicting policies of the antitrust laws and the Interstate Commerce Act, 49…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by335 opinions

  1. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Robinson v. Overseas Military Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. IUE AFL-CIO Pension Fund v. HerrmannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

330 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API