Legal Opinion

State v. Ferguson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 2008No. 2007-1427PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

{¶ 1} Appellant, Andrew J. Ferguson, a convicted rapist classified as a sexual predator, challenges the constitutionality of the 2003 version of R.C. Chapter 2950, the Sexual Offender Registration and Notification Law (“SORN”). SORN was amended by Am.Sub.S.B. No. 5 (“S.B. 5”), effective July 31, 2003.1 Appellant claims that S.B. 5 violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution and Section 10, Article I and Section 28, Article II of the Ohio Constitution, which states that the General Assembly has no power to enact laws that apply retroactively. See Van Fossen v. Babcock &…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. State v. BodykeOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. DelvallieOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. State v. BloomerOhio Supreme Court · 2009

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API