State v. Ferguson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.
{¶ 1} Appellant, Andrew J. Ferguson, a convicted rapist classified as a sexual predator, challenges the constitutionality of the 2003 version of R.C. Chapter 2950, the Sexual Offender Registration and Notification Law (“SORN”). SORN was amended by Am.Sub.S.B. No. 5 (“S.B. 5”), effective July 31, 2003.1 Appellant claims that S.B. 5 violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution and Section 10, Article I and Section 28, Article II of the Ohio Constitution, which states that the General Assembly has no power to enact laws that apply retroactively. See Van Fossen v. Babcock &…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- State v. BodykeOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. DelvallieOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. BloomerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.