Legal Opinion

In re Bruce S.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 2012No. 2012-0059PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, C.J.

{¶ 1} In this appeal, we answer a question certified, sua sponte, by the First District Court of Appeals: “May Senate Bill 10’s classification, registration, and community-notification provisions be constitutionally applied to a sex offender who had committed his sex offense between the July 1, 2007, repeal of Megan’s Law and the January 1, 2008, effective date of Senate Bill 10’s classification, registration, and community-notification provisions?” For the reasons that follow, we answer the question in the negative, as did the First District.

RELEVANT BACKGROUND

{¶ 2} Appellee, Bruce S.,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Clark v. ScarpelliOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Shay v. ShayOhio Supreme Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Riffle v. Physicians & Surgeons Ambulance Service, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. JarvisOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Elliot v. DurraniOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  5. In Re VonOhio Supreme Court · 2016

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API