Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Barclay's Capital Real Estate, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2013No. 2011-0908PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, C.J.

{¶ 1} In this case, which is before us on the certification of state-law questions by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Western Division, we address whether the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act (“CSPA”), codified in R.C. Chapter 1345, applies to the servicing of residential mortgage loans. We determine that it does not.

Relevant Background

{¶2} The federal court provided the following facts, circumstances, and allegations from which the questions of law arise:

{¶ 3} Barclays Capital Real Estate, Inc., doing business as HomEq Servicing (“HomEq”), defendant in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Einhorn v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Whitaker v. M.T. Automotive, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Williams v. Spitzer Autoworld Canton, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Heritage Hills, Ltd. v. DeaconOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Hurst v. Enterprise Title Agency, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. James Hagy v. Demers & AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. Bihn v. Fifth Third Mortgage Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
  3. Taylor v. First Resolution Invest. Corp. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Glazer v. Chase Home Fin., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Clark v. Lender Processing Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2013

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API