Legal Opinion

Matson v. Kivimaki

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 14, 1972No. 43267PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Todd, Justice.

Plaintiff Erik Matson, a minor, was bitten by a dog belonging to defendant, Rudolph Kivimaki. Erik and his father, plaintiff Robert Matson, brought this action for damages. The matter was submitted to the jury under instructions which included consideration of Minn. St. 347.22, the so-called “dog-bite statute,” and, alternatively, determination of common-law liability of defendant. The jury returned a general verdict, assessing damages for the injuries sustained by the minor child and allowing recovery of medical expenses to plaintiff Robert Matson. Defendant appeals from an…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McCormack v. Hankscraft CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. Goodwin v. E. B. Nelson Grocery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. Fake v. AddicksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Coenen v. Buckman Building CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  5. Lavalle Ex Rel. Lavalle v. KauppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. CrokerWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Boitz v. PreblichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Lewellin Ex Rel. Heirs of Lewellin v. HuberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. Ryman Ex Rel. Ryman v. AltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Kenney Ex Rel. Kenney v. BarnaNebraska Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API