Legal Opinion

McCormack v. Hankscraft Company

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 17, 1967No. 39627PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered upon an order of the district court granting judgment n. o. v. and a conditional new 'trial in favor of defendant, Hankscraft Company, Inc.

Plaintiff, Andrea McCormack, brought this action for damages by Donald McCormack, her father and natural guardian, alleging that defendant’s negligence and breach of implied and express warranties in the manufacture and sale of a steam vaporizer caused her to suffer substantial personal injuries. During the 3-week trial, defendant’s motions for a directed verdict following the submission of…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Lindroth v. Walgreen Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Piercefield v. Remington Arms Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State Stove Manufacturing Company v. HodgesMississippi Supreme Court · 1966

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. Phipps v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Hauter v. ZogartsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Hapka v. Paquin FarmsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Superwood Corp. v. Siempelkamp Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API