Legal Opinion

Coenen v. Buckman Building Corporation

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 29, 1967No. 40517PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment of the district court entered pursuant to a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff. Defendant seeks reversal and entry of judgment in its favor. The appeal does not make application for a new trial.

The accident which resulted in this action occurred when plaintiff stepped into an unlighted furnace pit located in the basement of de*195fendant’s budding. Since defendant claims that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law and that plaintiff, having awareness of the circumstances existing prior to and at the time of the accident, assumed…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Reardon v. ShimelmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  2. Ranum v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. City of Winona v. BotzetCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  4. Schrader v. KrieselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. Krueger v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Seidl v. Trollhaugen, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Krengel v. Midwest Automatic Photo, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Carpenter v. MattisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  4. Olson v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Bigham v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API