Coenen v. Buckman Building Corporation
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
Appeal from a judgment of the district court entered pursuant to a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff. Defendant seeks reversal and entry of judgment in its favor. The appeal does not make application for a new trial.
The accident which resulted in this action occurred when plaintiff stepped into an unlighted furnace pit located in the basement of de*195fendant’s budding. Since defendant claims that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law and that plaintiff, having awareness of the circumstances existing prior to and at the time of the accident, assumed…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Reardon v. ShimelmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Ranum v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- City of Winona v. BotzetCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Schrader v. KrieselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Krueger v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Seidl v. Trollhaugen, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Krengel v. Midwest Automatic Photo, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Carpenter v. MattisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Olson v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Bigham v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.