Fake v. Addicks
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Wright county, Smith, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict of $175 for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
The plaintiff was bitten and injured by a dog» alleged to be dangerous and accustomed to bite manídnd, and kept and owned by defendant with, knowledge of his vicious propensities. There was sufficient evidence to prove his vicious disposition, and that it was not safe to permit him to be at large. The testimony in plaintiff’s behalf was sufficient to show that the dog had attacked and bitten, or attempted to bite, several persons before the injury complained of. There was also evidence enough to support the verdict that the defendant had notice sufficient to warn him of his duty to kill or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Muller v. . McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Lynch v. . McNallyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Meier v. ShrunkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Murray v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876
- Keenan v. HaydenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by26 opinions
- Clements v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Kelley v. KilloureySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Nelson v. LewisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Engquist v. LoyasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Harris v. Breezy Point Lodge, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.