Legal Opinion
Boitz v. Preblich
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 19, 1987No. C4-86-1777PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Fred and Patricia Boitz brought an action based on strict liability, common law scienter, common law negligence, and negligence per se against respondents Paul Preblich and Jim Miller, for injuries Fred Boitz sustained when Preblich’s dog bumped him, causing him to fall. The trial court granted respondents’ motions for summary judgment on all causes of action. Fred and Patricia Boitz appeal. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for trial.
FACTS
On the morning of December 13,. 1984, Fred Boitz was driving through the alley behind his house when he noticed the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Nord v. HerreidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Sauter Ex Rel. Benson v. SauterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lewellin Ex Rel. Heirs of Lewellin v. HuberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Mueller v. TheisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Underhill v. HobelmanNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
- Morris v. WeatherlyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Manteuffel v. City of North St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.