Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Croker

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1976No. 4528PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUTHRIE, Chief Justice.

This appeal arises from the entry of a judgment of dismissal by the trial court at the close of plaintiff’s case.

The facts are not involved. The Crok-ers, appellees here, own and live at a residence in a rural area north of Cheyenne, and on September 18, 1974, had two dogs on the premises. McCarthy, appellant herein, is an insurance man employed by an agency which had written several policies of insurance for appellees, and on this date had occasion to go to the Croker residence to service some of these policies.

At the time of the incident Crokers were not home.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Zanetti Bus Lines, Inc. v. HurdCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  2. Sink Ex Rel. Pullen v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Elite Cleaners & Tailors, Inc. v. Gentry Ex Rel. GentryWyoming Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Kalman v. Western Union Telegraph CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Carter v. IdeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mountain Fuel Supply Co. v. EmersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Town of Jackson v. ShawWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Endresen v. AllenWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Matter of Estate of ReedWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Williams v. Collins Communications, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API