Legal Opinion

Lewellin Ex Rel. Heirs of Lewellin v. Huber

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 25, 1991No. C5-90-75PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

This case concerns liability under the dog owner’s liability statute, Minn.Stat. § 347.22 (1990). The court of appeals ruled that a dog’s nonhostile behavior which sets in motion a chain of events causing injury to a person some distance away comes within the statute and may impose liability on the dog owner. We disagree and reverse.

This case was presented to the trial court on cross-motions for summary judgment based on stipulated facts. Defendant-appellants Susan and Randy Huber owned a 6-month-old Golden Retriever. Before leaving on a vacation trip, they arranged for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Seim Ex Rel. Seim v. GaravaliaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Zerby v. WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Dart v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. Robinson v. ButlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  5. Lavalle Ex Rel. Lavalle v. KauppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. ChristophersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Mueller v. TheisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Morris v. WeatherlyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Hyatt v. Anoka Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  5. State v. SchramelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API