United States v. James Thomas Cherry
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RANDALL, Circuit Judge:
In United States v. Cherry, 733 F.2d 1124 (5th Cir.1984) (Cherry I), we set aside the murder conviction of defendant-appellant James Thomas Cherry, Jr., on the ground that his confession and other incriminating statements were obtained in violation of his Miranda rights and thus their admission at trial constituted reversible error. Following Cherry I, Cherry was once again tried in federal court and found guilty of murder. On appeal from his second murder conviction, Cherry asserts primarily that the district court, while properly holding the incriminating statements…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by192 opinions
- United States v. Francisco Sangineto-Miranda, (87-5667) Luray Betts, (87-5668) Enrique Vargas, (87-5711) & Benjamin Nelson, (87-5712)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Lenin M. Jerez and Carlos M. SolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Mary Dangerfield BengivengaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. George Terzado-MadrugaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Orlando Cordia Hall, Also Known as LanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
187 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.