Legal Opinion

United States v. Francisco Sangineto-Miranda, (87-5667) Luray Betts, (87-5668) Enrique Vargas, (87-5711) & Benjamin Nelson, (87-5712)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 30, 1990No. 87-5667, 87-5668, 87-5711 and 87-5712PublishedCited by 253 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

Francisco Sangineto-Miranda (“Sangine-to”), Luray Betts and Enrique Vargas pled guilty pursuant to Rule 11(a)(2), Fed.R. Crim.P., to charges of conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute and conspiracy to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. After a jury trial, Benjamin Nelson was convicted of the conspiracy charges and of one count of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) *1505and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Finding no merit to the contentions raised on appeal, we affirm.

I. FACTS

In early April…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by253 opinions

  1. State v. WaltonTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Burt Lancaster v. Stanley Adams, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. WaltonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Kevin R. Smith, Dalian C. Stewart, and Steve TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Guido Riascos-Suarez A/K/A Kennedy Diuza-RiascosCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

248 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API