United States v. Mary Dangerfield Bengivenga
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Chief Judge:
A jury found Mary Dangerfield Bengi-venga guilty of possessing marijuana with intent to distribute. A panel of this court reversed the conviction because the district court had denied Bengivenga’s motion to suppress evidence obtained before border patrol agents administered Miranda warnings.1 Our order granting rehearing en banc vacated the panel’s holding. We now affirm the conviction because Bengivenga was not “in custody” prior to her formal arrest and because, if a Miranda violation occurred, that alone would neither require exclusion of nontestimonial evidence nor…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by181 opinions
- State v. WaltonTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Freeman v. GoreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Francisco Sangineto-Miranda, (87-5667) Luray Betts, (87-5668) Enrique Vargas, (87-5711) & Benjamin Nelson, (87-5712)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Bevill v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Phillip Turner v. DriverCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
176 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.