Legal Opinion

United States v. Mary Dangerfield Bengivenga

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 25, 1988No. 86-2394PublishedCited by 181 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Chief Judge:

A jury found Mary Dangerfield Bengi-venga guilty of possessing marijuana with intent to distribute. A panel of this court reversed the conviction because the district court had denied Bengivenga’s motion to suppress evidence obtained before border patrol agents administered Miranda warnings.1 Our order granting rehearing en banc vacated the panel’s holding. We now affirm the conviction because Bengivenga was not “in custody” prior to her formal arrest and because, if a Miranda violation occurred, that alone would neither require exclusion of nontestimonial evidence nor…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by181 opinions

  1. State v. WaltonTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Freeman v. GoreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. Francisco Sangineto-Miranda, (87-5667) Luray Betts, (87-5668) Enrique Vargas, (87-5711) & Benjamin Nelson, (87-5712)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. Bevill v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Phillip Turner v. DriverCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017

176 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API