Legal Opinion
United States v. Lenin M. Jerez and Carlos M. Solis
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 19, 1997No. 95-1549, 95-1562PublishedCited by 190 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
Lenin Jerez and Carlos Solis pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Prior to entering the pleas, Mr. Jerez and Mr. Solis filed motions to suppress the cocaine which formed the basis of the charges on the ground that its seizure violated the Fourth Amendment. The district court denied the motions. Pursuant to their conditional plea agreements, Mr. Jerez and Mr. Solis now appeal the district court’s denial of their motions to suppress. For the reasons set forth in the following opinion, we reverse the judgment…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by190 opinions
- State v. Garcia-CantuCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
- United States v. Carlos Enrique Ramirez-ChilelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Kenneth Wayne BeckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Peter John CormierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Kenyatta Brack, Patrick Henderson, Willie Tyler, Nicholas Martinez, Maurita Stovall, and Dana RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.