Legal Opinion

Harding v. Bader

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1889PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Allegan. (Arnold, J.) Ejectment. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

Harding recovered below in an action of ejectment against defendants.

His claim of title as sustained on the trial was based upon two deeds executed by the Auditor General, and delivered to the plaintiff; one for the sale of the land in question for the taxes of 1875, and the other for the year 1878.

Bader was in possession at the time the suit was brought by Douglass, as his tenant, claiming title in fee, through title derived from the United States.

The land is situated in the township of Way land, Allegan county.

At the annual township meeting held on the fifth of April in the year 1815, $175…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boyce v. SebringMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Dickison v. ReynoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Hogelskamp v. WeeksMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. People ex rel. Hobert v. Supervisor & Town-Clerk of BlackmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Auditor General v. SparrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Square Lake Hills Condominium Ass'n v. Bloomfield TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Tillotson v. WebberMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Lewick v. GlazierMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Newaygo County Manufacturing Co. v. EchtinawMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API