Newaygo County Manufacturing Co. v. Echtinaw
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Newaygo. (Palmer, J.) Ejectment. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
Plaintiff recovered in the court below in an action of ejectment.
It is admitted that the defendant was in possession, claiming title at the time of commencement of suit. Plaintiff traced its title from the government of the Dnited States through several mesne conveyances. Defendant claims under tax deeds for the years 1876, 1877, 1878, and 1879. On the argument here it is admitted that the tax deeds for the years 1878 and 1879 are invalid. The defendant’s title, therefore, is made to rest upon the validity of the tax deeds for the years 1876 and 1877.
Defendant pleaded the general issue, with…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Niles Water Works v. Mayor of NilesMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Harding v. BaderMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by7 opinions
- Auditor General v. SparrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Taskey v. PaquetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Trump Manufacturing Co. v. Village of BuchananMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Weston Lumber Co. v. Township of MunisingMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Diamond Match Co. v. Village of OntonagonMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.