Legal Opinion

Auditor General v. Sparrow

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1898PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Appeal from Gogebic; Haire, J. In the matter of the petition of the auditor general for the sale of lands delinquent for the taxes of 1894: On objections filed by Edward W. Sparrow and others. All parties appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Several answers were filed by various landowners in opposition to the proceedings instituted in the circuit court of Gogebic county, under the statute, by the auditor general, for the foreclosure of tax liens and the collection of taxes for the year 1894; and the cause is brought to this court by appeal taken by all parties.

As it is conceded that the tax for county roads is invalid, there is no occasion to discuss that subject.

It is claimed that the entire county tax is invalid, for the want of a proper equalization and apportionment. The following quotation from the record will show the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Muirhead v. SandsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Sibley v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Tallman v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
  4. Buck v. People ex rel. SwigertIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Keith v. HaydenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. McCoun v. . PierpontNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co. v. Common Council of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Hughes v. JordanMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Prairie Oil Gas Co. v. Cruce, GovernorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Hooker v. BondMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API