Lewick v. Glazier
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Bill by William G. Lewick and others against Frank P. Glazier and the village of Chelsea to restrain the carrying out of a contract for waterworks. From a decree for complainants, defendant Glazier appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
In the summer of 1896 the defendant Frank P. Glazier began the construction of works, and the laying of street mains, with a view to supplying the village of Chelsea with water for fire and other purposes, in reliance upon a contract which had previously been made between the village, through its common council, and himself. Some resident taxpayers filed the bill in this cause to prevent the performance of this contract, upon the ground that it was void; making Glazier and the vil*495lage parties defendant. Before the hearing, the works were completed and put in operation. The defendant Glazier…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State ex rel. Parker v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Rutherford v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Presbury v. Fisher & BennettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
- Granger v. Original Empire Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
- People ex rel. Kunze v. Fort Wayne & Elmwood Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Edward E. Gillen Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Harvey v. LewisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Corliss v. Village of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Thompson v. School District No. 1Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Woodward v. City of WakefieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.