Boyce v. Sebring
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Osceola. (Judkins, J.) Ejectment. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChahpliN, J.
This is an action of ejectment. The defendant relies upon deeds from the State of Michigan executed by the Auditor General for the taxes delinquent for the years 1875, 1876, 1878, and 1880. The judgment in the court below was in favor of the defendant, and plaintiff brings the case here by a writ of error.
*213Nine errors are assigned. The first is that the court erred in admitting in evidence the State tax deed for the taxes of 1875, and the fifth assignment is that the court erred in holding and deciding that the taxes on the lands in question for 1875 were properly levied, and that defendant’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lacey v. Davis & McFarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1856
- Sibley v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
- Silsbee v. StockleMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Peninsula Iron & Lumber Co. v. Township of Crystal FallsMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Robbins v. BarronMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by13 opinions
- Haney v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Harding v. BaderMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Boyce v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- City of Birmingham v. Oakland County SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Cottle v. Union Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.