Legal Opinion

Dickison v. Reynolds

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1882PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Newaygo. Ejectment. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

Action of ejectment. The plaintiff had' judgment in the court below.

The plaintiff was one of the heirs at law of Frederic Diekison, deceased, and he claims the lands in dispute under-partition proceedings in the probate court, whereby they were set off to him in severalty. The seizin of Frederic Diekison, his death, and the descent of the title to the-plaintiff and others, are not disputed, but the proceedings in partition are contested as not being in compliance with the-statute. The defect which is particularly pointed out is the want of a decree of the probate court assigning the residue…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Campau v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Silsbee v. StockleMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Upton v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. LearnedMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Miller v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Crawford v. LiddleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. Harding v. BaderMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Richardson v. HowardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API