Alaska State Commission for Human Rights v. State, Department of Administration
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
This case involves the interpretation of AS 18.80.220(a)(5), specifically the meaning of the phrase “work of comparable character.” At a hearing following a complaint by a group of public health nurses, the Alaska State Commission for Human Rights (HRC) interpreted AS 18.80.220(a)(5) to require equal, pay for jobs of comparable value to the employer. The superior court reversed the decision on appeal. We affirm in part and remand in part.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In 1978 and 1979, 11 public health nurses (PHNs) filed claims with the Alaska State Commission…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Alaska Transportation Commission v. Airpac, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Gerlach v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1980
3Cited by5 opinions
- Muller v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
- University of Alaska v. TumeoAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Municipality of Anchorage v. SuzukiAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Muller v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Muller v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996