Legal Opinion

Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1987No. S-1769, S-1798 and S-1799PublishedCited by 214 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

This case concerns the regulatory authority of the Alaska Public Utilities Commission (APUC) under the Pipeline Act, AS 42.06.140-640. In short, we must determine whether the APUC has jurisdiction to regulate the transportation of crude and refined oil through Kenai Pipe Line Company's (KPL) marine terminal facilities. The APUC concluded that it had jurisdiction over all movements of oil, crude and refined. The superior court affirmed the APUC’s decision as to the movement of crude oil, but reversed as to the movement of refined oil, holding that “refined oil” was not…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. AlexAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. City & Borough of Juneau v. ThibodeauAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Rose v. Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by214 opinions

  1. Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Morningstar Water Users Ass'n v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Native Village of Elim v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Muller v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. DeShongAlaska Supreme Court · 2003

209 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API