Legal Opinion
Alaska Transportation Commission v. Airpac, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided July 27, 1984No. 7587PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BURKE, C.J., and RABINOW-ITZ, MATTHEWS, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ. MOORE, Justice.
This case involves the interpretation of AS 02.05.050(d)(5) and AS 02.05.250(7) and (10) of the Air Commerce Act.1 The primary issue is whether a “supplemental base of operations” as defined in AS 02.05.-250(10) is required to be certified by the Alaska Transportation Commission. AS 02.05.050(d)(5) only states that a “base of operations” need be certified. We hold that AS 02.05.050(d)(5) does require certification of both supplemental bases of operation and bases of operations; however, we interpret…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- City & Borough of Juneau v. ThibodeauAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Swanner v. Anchorage Equal Rights CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Premera Blue Cross v. State, Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development, Division of InsuranceAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Rydwell v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Charlie Brown Construction Co. v. City of Boulder CityNevada Supreme Court · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.