Legal Opinion

Gerlach v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 15, 1980No. Civ. A. 77-71715PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT

PATRICIA J. BOYLE, District Judge.

This is an action seeking relief for various alleged sexually discriminatory employment practices and policies of Defendant, Michigan Bell Telephone Company. Defendant, Michigan Bell Telephone Company, is a Michigan corporation with its principal office in Detroit. Plaintiffs are women who are or have been employed as Engineering Layout Clerks by Michigan Bell Telephone Company. 1 Plaintiffs’ claim in the proposed amended complaint (Second Amended Complaint) is…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United Steelworkers of America v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Dillingham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adams v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Vermett v. HoughDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1984
  3. Power v. Barry County, Mich.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1982
  4. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights v. State, Department of AdministrationAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Hegger v. Visteon Automotive Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API