Legal Opinion

Muller v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1996No. S-7128Published

1Opinion of the Court

923 P.2d 783 (1996)

Bambi (Relkin) MULLER and Lowell Relkin, Plaintiffs,

v.

BP EXPLORATION (ALASKA) INC., Defendant.

No. S-7128.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

September 13, 1996.

Harry Relkin, Albuquerque, New Mexico, pro se.

Ben J. Esch, Garretson & Esch, Anchorage, for Plaintiffs.

Katherine C. Tank, Perkins Coie, Anchorage, for Defendant.

Before COMPTON, C.J., RABINOWITZ, MATTHEWS, and EASTAUGH, JJ., and CARPENETI, J. Pro Tem.[*]

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

We here consider the effect of the marital status anti-discrimination clause in AS 18.80.220(a)(1). After an unmarried couple sued their…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Schneidewind v. ANR Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. AlexAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API