Municipality of Anchorage v. Suzuki
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Alaska Statute 09.55.275 requires a municipality to obtain preliminary approval of a replat before an eminent domain acquisition that results in a "boundary change." Because we hold that a "boundary change" results when a municipality takes an easement that is not coextensive with the property lines and that functionally interferes with the landowner's use, the statute required the Municipality of Anchorage to obtain preliminary approval of replats showing the easements involved here. We therefore affirm the superior court decision requiring the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. AlexAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Muller v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Gates v. City of Tenakee SpringsAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- State, Department of Natural Resources v. City of HainesAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- City of Valdez v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Simpson v. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium v. Settlement Funds Ex Rel. E.R.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Gibson v. GEICO General Ins. Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Albrecht v. Alaska Trustee, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.