Legal Opinion

Cedarholm v. STATE FARM MUTUAL INS. COMPANIES

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1959No. 8685PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McQUADE, Justice.

This is an action for declaratory judgment to determine rights of the plaintiffs-appellants, Ralph Cedarholm and Leah Cedarholm, husband and wife, and the defendant-respondent, State Farm Mutual Insurance Companies, in a draft drawn by the co-defendant, The Farmers Mutual Insurance Company.

Ralph and Leah Cedarholm will be hereinafter referred to as the appellants; State Farm Mutual Insurance Companies as the respondent; and The Farmers Mutual Insurance Company — which did not appear on appeal — as the defendant.

The appellants were injured and their car was damaged in a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Powers v. CALVERT FIRE INS. CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  2. Davenport v. BurkeIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Felton v. FinleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Iowa National Mutual Insurance v. HuntleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Coe v. BennettIdaho Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ortiz v. Great Southern Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Seiniger Law Office, P.A. v. North Pacific InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ElkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. Pena v. ThoringtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  5. Street v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API