Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Elkins

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 26, 1970No. 460PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNAGAN, Chief Justice.

This suit originated as an interpleader suit by Travelers Insurance Company and their insured, Ivy Hawthorne, to determine the rightful owner of $1,509.67. Willie Elkins, Sr. and his automobile insurer, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, were impleaded as defendants. The $1,509.-67 was part of a judgment obtained by El-kins against the interpleaders. State Farm asserted by cross-action that it owned the fund on deposit because it was subrogated to Elkins’ cause of action against Hawthorne to that extent. Elkins claimed the fund contending that State Farm had lost…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Thoreson v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Wichita City Lines, Inc. v. PuckettTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. General Exchange Insurance v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. International Insurance Co. v. Medical-Professional Building of Corpus ChristiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. Fort Worth & Denver Ry. Co. v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ortiz v. Great Southern Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Baier v. State Farm Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Baier v. State Farm InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GelineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Lancer Corp. v. Murillo, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API