Legal Opinion

Seiniger Law Office, P.A. v. North Pacific Insurance

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 2008No. 33192PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Appellants Breck Seiniger and Vivian Jennings (collectively “Appellants”), awarding damages and attorney fees and costs as to their claim against Respondent North Pacific Insurance Company (North Pacific) under the common fund doc tróle. On appeal, Appellants assert the district court erred by failing to consider their claim based upon breach of contract and denying their motion to amend their complaint to assert a claim for punitive damages. North Pacific also cross-appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. White v. Unigard Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Myers v. Workmen's Auto InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Saint Alphonsus Diversified Care, Inc. v. MRI Associates, LLPIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Mortensen v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Brown v. GreenheartIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Printcraft Press, Inc. v. Sunnyside Park Utilities, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API