Legal Opinion

State v. Koch

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1988No. 16765PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

Carl Koch was convicted by a jury of aggravated driving under the influence, a felony. I.C. § 18-8006. Koch raises four issues relating to the trial proceedings: whether the trial court committed reversible error in admitting into evidence the results of Koch’s blood test; whether the jury was properly instructed as to the legal effect of Koch’s blood alcohol concentration level; whether sufficient evidence supports the verdict of guilty; and whether the prosecutor’s remarks in his rebuttal argument constitute reversible error. We affirm.

The record shows that, while at a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. DeckerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. State v. HartwigIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. State v. KnollIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Country Insurance v. Agricultural Development, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. LavyIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. MauroIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. RolesIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. State v. TribeIdaho Supreme Court · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API