State v. Decker
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
In August 1983, Rod Peterson, a motor home dealer, loaned a pickup truck to Ivan Perry Decker. Decker failed to return it. He was subsequently charged with grand theft, I.C. §§ 18-2403(1), 18-2407(1). After a jury trial, he was convicted. He now appeals, challenging only the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction. Specifically, he contends the evidence was insufficient to prove that he “intended to permanently deprive the victim of the use [or] benefit of the vehicle.” 1 We affirm.
Appellate review of the sufficiency of the evidence is limited in scope. A judgment of conviction,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. CampbellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. FenleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. FilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
3Cited by165 opinions
- State v. KnutsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. FlowersIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. ClarkIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. RozajewskiIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. James Patrick Stell, Jr.Idaho Court of Appeals · 2017
160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.