Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1990No. 17136PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a criminal case in which a father was convicted of lewd conduct with his ten-year-old daughter. There are three issues presented on this appeal:

1. Should the trial court have instructed the jury that they were not required to reach a verdict, but might be a “hung jury?”

We hold that the jury instructions were sufficient to advise the jury that they were not required to change their opinion simply to reach a verdict.

2. Did the trial court violate its own prior ruling or the rules of evidence in not restricting the daughter from testifying that her father had improperly…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BinghamIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. CarterIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. RandlesIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. BootheIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. State v. TerryIdaho Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. State v. RaudebaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GleasonIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. BlakeIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. LovelaceIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Van Brunt v. StoddardIdaho Supreme Court · 2001

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API