Legal Opinion

State v. Roles

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided January 27, 1992No. 18822PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

In March, 1990, a jury found Raymond Allen Roles guilty of rape, I.C. § 18-6101, -6107; first degree kidnapping, I.C. § 18-4501, -4502; aggravated assault, I.C. § 18-901(b), -905(b); and one count of forcible sexual penetration with a foreign object, I.C. § 18-6608. Before sentencing, Roles moved for a new trial. He then substituted counsel who filed an amended motion for a new trial asserting the following grounds: the prosecution failed to disclose exculpatory information, Roles received ineffective assistance of counsel and the jury was not instructed on Roles’s theo ry of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Russell v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Chapman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Giles v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. WoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API