State v. Roles
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SWANSTROM, Judge.
In March, 1990, a jury found Raymond Allen Roles guilty of rape, I.C. § 18-6101, -6107; first degree kidnapping, I.C. § 18-4501, -4502; aggravated assault, I.C. § 18-901(b), -905(b); and one count of forcible sexual penetration with a foreign object, I.C. § 18-6608. Before sentencing, Roles moved for a new trial. He then substituted counsel who filed an amended motion for a new trial asserting the following grounds: the prosecution failed to disclose exculpatory information, Roles received ineffective assistance of counsel and the jury was not instructed on Roles’s theo ry of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Russell v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Chapman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Giles v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. WoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.