Legal Opinion

Country Insurance v. Agricultural Development, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1984No. 15296PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

I

Country Insurance Company, in its statement of issues presented raises the sole contention that the trial court committed prejudicial error in revising a special verdict after the jury instruction conference where the trial court did not thereafter give counsel an opportunity to read and consider said revision and register objections thereto. The giving of the revised special verdict is not itself assigned as error.

The main theme of the appeal is set forth in Country Insurance’s brief as follows:

Archer and Taylor[1] can be distinguished from this case in a number of…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, New Jersey v. BurchTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Prashker v. United States Guarantee Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Cunningham Brothers, Inc. v. Harry BailCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  4. Lide v. MearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Taylor v. HerboldIdaho Supreme Court · 1971

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Suitts v. First Security Bank of Idaho, N.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Lubcke v. Boise City/Ada County Housing AuthorityIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Vendelin v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Needs v. HebenerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API