Legal Opinion

State v. Knoll

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1986No. 16050PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

We are asked to review a district court decision upholding a judgment of conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol. The appeal presents two questions: (1) Does Idaho’s DUI statute create separate offenses — driving under the influence of alcohol, and driving with a proscribed blood-alcohol content — which require mutually exclusive methods of proof? (2) Is the result of a blood-alcohol test admissible without supplementary evidence showing how the result “relates back” to the time when the motor vehicle was operated?

These issues are framed by undisputed facts. At…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Umphrey v. SprinkelIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. DumontSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  4. State v. RollinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. Board of Tax AppealsIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. GarrettIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Matter of GriffithsIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
  4. State v. HartwigIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. State v. RobinettIdaho Supreme Court · 2005

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API